A new article on peacebuilding efforts in Yemen.
“This bleak assessment of the role of CS [civil societies] during war seems to confirm the growing critique of international CS peacebuilding policies and indeed of aid more generally. However, these issues do not apply in similar weight to all CSOs in Yemen. As discussed by Dibley (2014), various circumstances shape the ability of CSOs to exercise independent agency. Our categorisation of organisations into three types sheds some further light on this. Donor-driven organisations, operating at the national level, best fit the picture painted by the critics. But this is less true of the other types of CSOs active in Yemen: local-level grassroots self-help organisations, often with a tribal or religious background, and new activist organisations originating from the Yemeni Spring.
Whilst these actors, too, are severely affected by the violence and prone to political capture, grassroots CSOs, which are less of a target for political actors due to their lowkey activities, continue to offer vital support to the victims of the war. Meanwhile, new activist CSOs attempt to avoid political co-optation and to continue to speak out politically, even though this presents severe risks. This group also includes e-activists who operate from abroad; these are able to raise awareness on the Yemeni conflict, rights violations, and strategies for peacebuilding, without risking life and limb.”